Monthly Archives: September 2010

A case study: how to recruit minority students

0
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as , ,

I know it’s kind of tacky to post about one’s job on his personal blog (even if the blogger takes care to keep his job anonymous) but I would like to say that I like my job a lot. A LOT. That, plus school, is why I have been neglecting this blog of late. *smile*

What do I do? Well, in a nutshell, I’m working with a team to help organize various film festivals that our University hosts.

When I was being interviewed for my job, my interviewer brought up one thing that she saw as a central problem: our film department is so un-diverse compared to the rest of the campus. I was just nodding in agreement the whole time – I have written about this before.1 We all agreed that we needed to fix the current state of affairs.

Our current strategy is to subtly encourage minority youth to apply to our program.

Example: this year, we will host a filmmaking workshop for high school students who belong to a certain minority. (To try to retain my anonymity, I’m not naming the minority.) This is our “ideal” scenario: The students arrive -> they feel inspired/empowered by the workshop -> they feel motivated to submit their work to our youth film festival -> they decide that this University is actually a pretty cool place and they decide to attend it -> they get their education and the University becomes a more diverse environment, which is a win-win situation.

Yes, it’s a pretty big goal. But I feel that it is realistic enough to work, which I really like. Also, it provides the students with concrete tools to succeed, like editing lessons, rather than simply tokenizing the students.

Personally, I feel that even if a student only reaches step two (become inspired/empowered by the workshop) in this theoretical series of events, that is a really great result in and of itself. If the student decides to attend school on the other side of the country, it’s still a pretty great outcome – in an industry that can sometimes feel highly inaccessible to minorities all over the country (if not the world), increased diversity anywhere is really great imo. Of course, if a student does decide to enroll in our University, that is a great outcome too – as much as I critique it at times, our film program is a very solid program that provides very real benefits to people enrolled in it.

So, in a nutshell, that’s why I like my job – it’s a chance to contribute to something that I feel strongly about, and the goals are very sound. I also appreciate that there is optimism in addition to realism – I’m not the type of person who thrives on a diet of 100% cynicism. Also, I like my coworkers – they have ideas, I have ideas; it’s nice being part of a team of people who are motivated to do this kind of thing.

If you are curious, here are the nuts & bolts of my job:

I do a fair bit of office grindwork. (By office grindwork, I mean things like stuffing envelopes, buying reams of paper, answering emails, proofreading or writing our business letters, etc.) However, I also have a lot of agency in the decision-making process – it’s pretty different from being an intern.2 So, at this stage, we have to figure out the best way to advertise our festival, who to advertise the festival to, and so forth. Later on, we will process the entries. Then, even later on, we will actually hold the festival and make sure that all the logistics work.

I think that pretty much any non-profit type of business has this basic combination of office work + big goals + programs designed to benefit society at large + advertising/PR + organizing the logistics of events (whether they are fundraisers or film festivals). In other words, I feel that the best non-profits involve a combination of activism and pragmatism. That combination really appeals to me and that is why I want to continue working in a non-profit arts organization in the future.

-~-~-~
  1. I would recommend that you start by reading my post about diversity within film programs. It is pretty long but that is because I tried to be as thorough as possible. []
  2. To be clear: I’m not dissing the role of an internship. I have loved the majority of my internships. If you’re a young college student, I’d encourage you to get as many internships as possible, even if that means balancing your unpaid internship with a paying job. Most likely it will help you get a paid job in your field later on. []
Share

An Argument in Favor of A Larger University

0
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as , ,

I readily admit that, at times, being a transfer student is frustrating. However, I am glad that I transferred into this university. One reason is because the disability services is really great. Personally, I chalk it up to the fact that it is a large public urban campus.

When I was initially selecting colleges, this was our logic: “A smaller college with smaller class sizes will be more ideal for me, because there are fewer people that I will have to keep track of when lipreading and so forth.” Therefore, I enrolled in a college with a student body of approximately 2,000 people.

Well, as it turned out, I chose a college that was in a state that was not particularly well-suited to my needs. Back then, I was just a kid from the Rockies who got Boston, New York, Washington DC, and other East coast cities mixed up very easily – they were essentially all the same city to me. I quickly learned the difference when trying to hire an interpreter who was fluent in the communication method that I grew up with. The nearest person who even knew it lived about two hours away in cow country. She wasn’t even an interpreter – she was just a mom who had used it with her own son. I appreciated the effort that my access coordinator went through with regards to hiring her, but I couldn’t understand a word that she said. If I had chosen to go to college someplace like Washington DC, this would not have been as much of a problem because more people there know the communication method.

On top of this, I chose a college in the suburbs. Most of the interpreters were based in the city or in suburbs the next state over, so it was difficult to find people willing to travel to my college.

Another issue was that – as much as I hate to say it – the accessibility department wasn’t particularly well-suited to my needs. Since the school was so small, only one person worked in the accessibility department. This person’s speciality was not in deaf issues – in fact, I was the first deaf student that the college had ever handled. As a result, I found that I often had to explain basic things about deafness to somebody who should have been helping me.

To their credit, the college worked very hard to accommodate my needs because they really wanted me there, but I still felt constrained by all of these limitations. It was one of the several reasons that I transferred. 1

I transferred into a large public university in the nearest city because it had a really good reputation in my field of interest and because I was tired of moving so many places. I didn’t particularly want to relocate to yet another city, so I just stayed close to my original college.

As it turns out, a large public university is much better with regards to meeting my needs, and I love that aspect of the school.

First of all, there’s the issue of location. There is a much greater pool of interpreters to choose from – everybody is based in or near this city, so it’s no big deal to request an interpreter because there’s a lot more people willing to travel to my campus.

Also, this university actually employs interpreters on its staff! There are other deaf people who attend this University. So, although some of my interpreters come from independent agencies, quite a few of them come from the University itself. 2

And the disability services center? Well, there’s a whole staff on board there. Instead of just having one person handle every single student with a disability, there are enough people to work with specialities: mental health, learning disabilities, physical disabilities, assistive technology, deaf services, etc. I no longer have to explain everything about deafness to a person who is supposed to help me – now I can just chat (usually in simcom) with somebody who was specifically trained to work with deaf people. It is wonderful! (And it helps that our senses of humor mesh very well.)

At my previous university, Access Services told me that I basically had to stick to a very firm class schedule. Once I had decided on what classes to take, I was stuck with those all semester. No shopping around for me. To be fair, I can understand this – it was so difficult for them to find interpreters willing to work at our college. But I still disliked the fact that I couldn’t, say, switch out of a class that I knew that I’d hate from day one. Because flexibility was more important to me than anything else, I wound up just not requesting any interpreters and using a combination of lipreading, listening with my cochlear implant, and relying a lot on the course readings to get by in classes.

In contrast, I have complete freedom and flexibility at this university. If I go to a class and decide to drop it two weeks later because I hate it, I can just email my access coordinator and say, “Hey, this isn’t working out. I’m dropping this class; I’ll let you know what class I add to replace it.” The first few times I did this, I was wary and very apologetic because of my previous experiences, but the access coordinator said, “You have just as much of a right as any other student to shop for classes – don’t worry about it!” I think that a large factor in this is the fact that we have a lot more resources to draw from – it’s easier to find interpreters, and it’s easier to match interpreters to students because there is more demand for them on the campus.

Going to a large public urban university comes with issues of its own, of course. For example, there’s all that bureaucratic red tape – they didn’t add my AP scores to my credits until this year, even though I enrolled in 2009. But, overall, I’m a lot more content with its offerings for deaf students than I was with a small private university in the suburbs.

-~-~-~
  1. I can name about 4-5 different reasons that I transferred – if I had had just one individual problem, I would probably have just sucked it up, but when all of the factors combined, I pretty much felt compelled to transfer. []
  2. I mostly use ASL interpreters – I have not tried again to request somebody who knows the communication method that I grew up with. But it is so easy to get ASL interpreters that I really have no incentive to try again. []
Share

Autobiography as a Reader

2
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as ,

The first few weeks of a semester are usually pretty hectic for me as I adjust to a new routine. After I’ve got it all down, though, I can relax. (Until finals, that is.) Right now, I’ve adjusted to my new routine and am relaxing. Hopefully, you’ll see more blog posts from me.

One of the classes that I’m taking is a basic composition class. Imagine a course that is a combination of “how to do college,” “English 101,” “history 101,” and “how to read & write good.” That’s basically what this course is. Even though my original graduation date was 2010, I have to take this because I’m a transfer student. It’s frustrating, to be honest, but that’s another story.

For this class, one of our first assignments was to produce an autobiography of our lives as a reader. Basically: “What books have had a great impact upon you? How have books been a factor in your life? What is your relationship to books, now and in the past?” It had to be 300-400 words and it had to be “informally” written rather than academically.

At first, I wrote about my climb out of the insane “zombie pit” of Christian fundamentalism, but then I decided that that was way too personal, so I talked about deafness instead. This is a strategy that I use a lot, actually. When I don’t want to talk about one of my other minority statuses, I talk about deafness because it is relatively value-neutral as compared to other marginalized groups that I belong to. In this case, I have no idea how my professor feels about Christian fundamentalism – for all I know, he may be a strong Tea Party supporter or something. It’s not likely in this part of the country, but it’s possible. On the other hand, since he didn’t react adversely to my interpreters, I took the assumption that it would be okay to talk about being deaf. (I have had professors who took a strong dislike to my interpreters, but that’s another story.)

This is the essay that I handed in:

    I was born deaf. One of the first statistics that my Hearing parents ran across upon my diagnosis at age two was that deaf children graduate high school with a fourth grade reading level. (This statistic is based upon flawed research, but this was twenty years ago.) My parents subsequently focused all of their efforts upon teaching me English in the most unambiguous and straightforward way.
    Thanks to this combination of parental support and a strong natural inclination towards all things visual, including reading, I quickly became a bookworm. Instead of playing ball, I sat in the outfield and read. Not all deaf people are visual thinkers, but I am. To me, the English language was another thing to see in a visual world. My parents never read aloud to me due to communication issues – besides, why wait for your parents to finish reading a sentence when you can finish the book at the same speed?
    There were no communication barriers in reading: in a world where nobody, except for my younger sister, could understand me and vice-versa, books were an integral part of my life. (I failed penmanship in school, and it took twelve years of speech therapy before the majority of the world understood my speech.)
    With words, I could teach myself things. I quickly learned that most teachers simply read things from the worksheet in front of you. I breezed through the work while the teacher droned on; I often got in trouble for not doing work at the same pace as the rest of the class. Thankfully, my high school teachers were far more understanding. With my voracious appetite for knowledge, I graduated with a high GPA.
    I initially went to a college that is at the same level as an Ivy and used books to escape my problems. For two years, I buried myself in dense jargon-laden texts about semiotics, castration anxiety, social constructions, and so forth. At some point, I realized that this strategy wasn’t working, so I switched to a less academically intense school ([name of current school]) so that I could have space to confront things head-on.
    Today, I have more or less put my life in order. For a while, I avoided reading, but now I luxuriate in reading highbrow and lowbrow alike. bell hooks, Stephen King, Tamora Pierce, Philip K Dick, James Baldwin… just another typical month in my reading journal.

Truthfully, this essay is really unfinished. If I had spent more time on this essay instead of the Christian fundamentalist essay, I would have found a way to make it sound less snotty, especially near the end. I don’t think I’m that snobby – it’s really just frustration at the fact that I have to take this class leaking out in the end of that essay. But, yeah, that’s basically a summation of what books have meant to me as a deaf person.

Also, if you are curious, the “personal problems” that I was talking about was just the logistics of coming out – telling my friends and family, making doctor appointments, going to the city hall, going to the DMV, seeing the Social Security Office, etc – all those exhausting things that come with the territory. I am done with all of that now, thank god. As much as I hate the red tape that comes with being a transfer student, I’m glad that I had space to focus on my life instead of having to worry about it while *also* being expected to read & write really difficult texts.

Incidentally, I have thought about sharing the Christian fundamentalism essay on this blog, but I’m not sure. What are your thoughts? It’s such a personal topic that I’m not sure how I feel about exposing the entire Internet to it. But at the same time, there’s so little about ex-fundies on the Internet that I kind of feel like it’d be nice to contribute to that dialogue, even though it’s not the main focus of my blog. Thoughts?

Share

Police brutality & deaf people

0
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as , , , ,

In a nutshell: this video by Sabina England is about a partly Deaf Native American man who was murdered by a cop simply because he couldn’t hear the cop. The video is signed, but it has captions for those who don’t know ASL. [Youtube link]

Transcript under the jump:
Click for transcript

So, here’s a really horrible example of police brutality and how it should be a central issue to talking about Deaf rights. I hate to say it, but this type of story is not very uncommon. It’s probably one of my biggest fears. Not to minimize what John went through, but I can definitely think of instances in the past where authority figures – lifeguards, teachers, etc – have shouted at me to stop. When I didn’t hear them, I got in trouble.

But what if I ever found myself in a situation where I had to face an unfriendly cop? Or, in the comments: “that’s happen to before one man deaf was in bank for take out of money somehow the man who trying to rob deaf man but he yelled at him n he couldn’t hear n he yelled “don’t turn around” so, deaf man turned around n he shot his head n took his money.” These types of scenarios – being killed just because I’m deaf and can’t hear what a crazy person wants me to do – scares the crap out of me.

One could argue that the cop had no way of knowing that John was deaf, but that’s ridiculous – you don’t shoot somebody who is just walking along. Just approach him to resolve the conflict. What is this “shoot first, ask questions later” mentality all about? It doesn’t make sense and it scares me to see cops behaving in this way.

There’s also cultural issues here – John is Deaf, and he is Native American. Both of these cultures clash with the dominant paradigm and caused his actions and intentions to be misinterpreted. I don’t feel like I know enough to critically analyze the whole issue but I do want to underline this as an example of intersectionality.

Near the end, Sabina England says, “How can we be assured that our rights will be kept in mind if we’re being confronted by cops but can’t hear or understand them?”
This made me think about the importance of communication, not just hearing. She doesn’t expand upon this, but again, I think back to previous experiences with authority figures who think that I’m trying to be smart when I say that I don’t understand them. They get exasperated, which has the potential of causing the conflict to escalate. If the cop had walked up to John and asked him what was going on, what would have happened if John had said, “I don’t know what you said”? Would the cop have assumed, ‘this guy is trying to play dumb and pretend that he doesn’t have a knife,’ and then handcuffed him? It’s just speculation, but it doesn’t seem very improbable to me.

As an afterword, the vlogger who put up this video is Sabina England, aka Jihad Punk 77. She is a fairly well-known blogger – I have seen her everywhere in the blogosphere. Her blog is here – I will mention that I don’t agree with everything she says or does, but she’s an interesting voice in the blogosphere.

Share

Living in the 21st Century

1
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as ,


[Visual description: People sit in a cafe while using laptops.]

Computers have become part of mainstream culture. In the late 90s, people thought that the Internet was a fad, but very few people today still think that the Internet is a fad.

In 1994, spending time playing in MUDs, chatting on IRC, and even writing emails were all activities that a fairly small fringe of society participated in. Nowadays, it is the rare person who does not have a Facebook; not having an e-mail address is unthinkable.

However, some people that I’ve encountered are not happy with this state of affairs. They yearn for a time in which we didn’t have all of these Facespace or Myface websites but instead talked to each other in real life. They yearn for a time when we didn’t have our creativity stifled by staring at the screen for hours on end.

Okay, I agree that the Internet is not perfect. Not everyone has equal access to the Internet, and there are inequalities online. This is an issue that I care about. However, most of the critiques that I hear don’t engage these points; instead, they yearn for a “better” time that is long gone.

Honestly, one thing that I really don’t understand about these critiques? When Hearing people talk about being chained to the Internet and feeling like it’s a weak mirror of “actual” social life, it’s not an experience that I can relate to at all.

The thing is, not all of us have the same experience with the Internet. I have spoken before about growing up on the Internet, a space where I was able to understand others for the first time. Later on, when I was trying to figure out my own identity as a queer individual, the Internet was a great resource for meeting others.

In other words, the Internet connects some of us; it doesn’t isolate us.

Plus, these criticisms seem to be about ten years late to the party – people have been talking to each other on the Internet for a long time, and they’ve been using computers for even longer.

Getting back to what I said earlier about inequalities online? Yeah, I think that those are important to talk about. Personally, though, I think that the solution is more integration of the Internet into everybody’s life, not less. But I am open to being wrong on this point – let me know what you think.

-~-~-~

Update, added to this post on 9/26/10: s.e. smith has written a post named My Friends in the Internet. Once again, s.e. smith says something that I wanted to articulate so perfectly that I’m pointing at it and saying, “This. This is what I meant.” (This has happened to me a lot, actually.) smith’s central point in this post is that the hierarchization of the communication methods smacks of ableism – I am in total agreement.
I do want to qualify my previous post about the Internet by saying that I am not an introvert. I thought I was for years, but I’ll talk about that in another post. I am not happy just sitting all by myself, not talking with people. My favorite online activities involve talking with others.
I do prefer talking to people in real life, but I think that this is mostly due to the amount of effort that people give to the interaction – if I meet a friend over a cup of coffee, it’s harder for the friend to ignore me because we’ve both gone to the effort of meeting in real life to hang out. Online, I have some friends who take the communication so lightly that they don’t say “be right back” before leaving for 20 minutes. (If you’re a friend and wondering, “Does this apply to me?” – maybe, but no hard feelings towards you; I still love you.)
Anyway, I really like smith’s blog, This Ain’t Livin’, in general. To be honest, I don’t agree with some of the posts, but that’s the way it is with anybody in this world – I doubt that there are two people in this world who are 100% in agreement about every single issue. It’s a good blog; go check it out.

Share