Hello everyone. I got three hours of sleep, then travelled for a long time to get back home from visiting family, then went to class. Alas, I do not have a scheduled post, so I was despairing the prospect of writing one from scratch… then along came David, who remarked that:
I think capitalizing “hearing” is a bit odd, as there is no community built around the ability to hear, though there are many communities that use spoken languages and that tend to assume people can hear.
Emily also asked me to clarify the capitalization of “Hearing” a week or so ago on gchat.
Thank you, Emily and David, for giving me a post idea! Now I can type up a quick little post while my rice cooks and then collapse into bed.
So, like I said in Capitalization vs Lower Case a few days ago, I don’t really think that capitalization vs lowercase is a useful distinction in all cases. But I do sometimes refer to Hearing people as opposed to hearing people.
It’s true that there isn’t really a Hearing culture per se. However, there’s a set of attitudes that are often called “audist” – basically, audism consists of assuming that one needs to have hearing in order to do anything. Audism consists partly of what David mentions – the assumption that people can hear – but it goes beyond that and considers deafness to be a mark of inferiority. So, when I talk about a Hearing person, I sometimes mean an audist person. Come to think of it, I probably should just go ahead and say “an audist” in those cases.
Sometimes I use “Hearing” to refer to people who are ignorant. Ignorance is not problematic in and of itself – I meet very few hearing people who instantly understand everything about deafness from the word “go.” Ignorance only becomes a problem when the person does not make an effort to educate him- or herself or doesn’t use common sense to think about how to interact with someone who is different. I’ve been lucky with my friends, but I’ve had one or two friends who continue to “forget” that I am deaf and/or don’t use common sense. This means that I have to choose between explaining yet again the realities of deaf life – for example, “You should not cover your mouth when you talk so that I can lipread you” – or just standing there awkwardly while I wonder why this person keeps forgetting the basics of interacting with a human being who happens to be different from him- or herself. I’m not a demanding person – I understand that not everyone will come to the table with a full knowledge of deaf issues, and I’m okay if somebody occasionally forgets to face me or whatever. When it comes up in every single interaction that we have, it becomes insulting. All I ask is that a person knows how to read a situation in order to determine the best way to interact with others who are different.
So, to talk about a hearing person who refuses to educate him- or herself in order to sustain prolonged interaction with me… I’m not sure what I’d call that. Perhaps “privileged,” since this type of behavior usually comes from a person who is ignorant of his or her own privilege. But that doesn’t really work perfectly. My sleep-deprived brain isn’t coming up with anything, and the rice is boiling over, so I’m gonna end the post here. Do any of you lovely readers have any ideas?

