Monthly Archives: March 2011

Background noise and mood

8
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as

A few weeks ago, I read a podcast about mapping the world that was divided in five sections: sight, hearing, smell, touch, and taste. I found the “hearing” section to be especially interesting because they interviewed somebody who claims that feelings of alienation, boredom, etc, come from background noise. I’ve copy-pasted a transcript under the jump.

Read more…

The full podcast is here. There are no transcripts, but I obtained transcripts for the rest of the episodes, so email me if you are interested in reading those.

Anyway. The reason that this segment interested me is because I currently live in a city, but I’m deaf. Since Toby Lester attributes the ennui of our current society to background noise, it made me wonder what the full ramifications of his argument are. If we extend his thesis to include d/Deaf people, what happens?

A little bit of background. I wear my cochlear implant to communicate with hearing people or to listen to music and movies, but when I’m walking around the city, I don’t wear it half the time. For example, I always take it off in the subway. In addition to that, my cochlear implant is never going to replicate human hearing perfectly. It only has 24 channels of hearing, whereas the human ear has tens of thousands of channels. When Toby Lester talked about the hum of his computer, I was surprised – I never realized that computers buzz. Maybe Toby just has really sensitive ears, but the fact is that, even with my cochlear implant, I don’t hear everything that hearing people can.

I don’t really notice a difference in my mood, though. The logical implication of Toby Lester’s argument is that d/Deaf people would be happier than hearing people because they don’t have to deal with as much background noise. In reality, I enjoy not having to listen to the loud express subway clattering past my stop, but it doesn’t seem that profound to me.

Perhaps I’m just unable to see a difference because, for me, deafness is normal. I was born deaf and it has been my reality for over twenty years. I’m just a “hearing” person part of the time to get by in society and to enjoy things like music.

So, what do you guys think? Does background noise or lack thereof affect your mood?

Share

Planning Ahead

0
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as , , ,

A large portion of my life as a deaf individual within a hearing world involves planning ahead. When I thought about it, I realized a central part of my college experience is that it requires a unique level of planning ahead that most people don’t have to worry about. For example, today I was telling someone that I can’t skip classes at the last minute because I have interpreters.

I feel that that requires a bit of explanation. First of all, I really like both of my interpreters this semester as human beings, and I know that they both commute a pretty long distance to get to my school. So, for one thing, I’d feel really shitty if they commuted such a long way and then found that I wasn’t there. I mean, come on.

Second of all, my school would get billed anyway if I didn’t show up. I once worked at my school’s disability center, so I got to see the numbers. Where I am, it costs between $40-$60 to hire an interpreter for an hour, and you have to pay for a minimum of two hours. That means I’d cost the school $80-$120 at a minimum. The interpreting agency requires that you must tell them a week in advance about cancellations if you want to avoid a bill.
Emergencies happen, of course, but it means that I can’t just skip class because it’s a beautiful day and I want to stay outside.

I’m a senior in college. Let’s get real here – I’m not gonna go to every single class. I mean, come on. So, in the end, what happens is that I skip a class sometimes to take a break from things. I always plan out my absence at least a week in advance. I email my access coordinator to say, “Hey, I can’t make it to class on [insert date],” then I do something productive with my time like taking a trip to see a friend. In the end, planning out my absences helps me feel that I got the most value out of skipping class.

Another example is that, lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about the future. I’m not yet ready for graduate school, though it’s a possibility, and I know for sure that I want to live in the mountains again – I grew up in the Rockies, so I fucking miss having mountains around me. But I don’t know if I want to live in Seattle, Portland, Montana, Northern California, Colorado, or… there’s so many choices, really! As a result, I’ve been tossing around the idea of bumming around on the West coast. Basically, I want to keep moving until I find a place that makes me say, “Hey, I could live here.”

Some of my very favorite people in the world have bummed around. So when I look at their bumming-around experiences, all of them basically go like this: “Save up some money, hop in my car, drive until I find a place to stop, get a temporary job or busk to get some extra cash, get out of there, do the whole thing again.” I realize it doesn’t sound great to everyone, but it sounds like a fun adventure to me.

The problem, though, is that I freeze up at the “getting a job” stage. I mean, when I think of bumming-around friendly jobs, I think of jobs that are temporary and have a high turnover rate. That, in turn, leads me to think of things like waitressing, retail, fast food, and working as a barista.

Here’s the problem, though: Many of those jobs involve communicating with the public, especially the ones that pay relatively higher. That’s what stops me. For instance, I imagine myself trying to take orders at a coffeeshop while the espresso machine grinds in the background. In my head, I end up asking the customer to repeat him or herself about ten million times, and the customer gets really upset and then my manager gets upset. It’s not a good scenario.

It’s not entirely about money, though I do admit I get anxious when I don’t have a steady stream of income and that it’s not exactly the best economy to go bumming about in. But you see, I’m not the type who can just live off of his savings forever – I have to feel like I’m giving back to society in some form. I have this strong desire to help others; it’s what propels me through life. When I can’t do something as simple as giving people their food because of the way that this society is structured, that bums me out sometimes.

But then, I remember: it’s simply a matter of planning ahead! Just like I have to plan in advance for something as simple as skipping a stupid core class, I just have to apply a little bit of thought to this “moving around until I find a place I want to live” idea. I could, for example, find a four-month internship with a stipend centered around helping homeless queer youth in Portland. Or I could become a ski instructor. Or I could actively seek out d/Deaf communities as a starting point and work from there. Or… well, I don’t know. It’s a story in progress. Stay tuned, guys.

Share

Why Speculative Fiction is One of My Favorite Genres

2
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as

I read everything under the sun. Everything. But many of my favorite genres, such as soft scifi, fall under the umbrella of “speculative fiction.” It makes me feel pretentious to use the term “speculative fiction,” but here’s a definition:

Speculative fiction is an umbrella term encompassing the more highly imaginative fiction genres, specifically science fiction, fantasy, horror, supernatural fiction, superhero fiction, utopian and dystopian fiction, apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction, and alternate history in literature as well as related static, motion, and virtual arts.1

Basically, it’s a good term, so I’ll use it despite the fact it makes me feel pretentious.

Back to my point: The reason that I like speculative fiction is because it speaks in the language of metaphors. I feel that that gives an author much more freedom to say whatever he or she wants.

For example, I recently saw Serenity for the first time. I had seen the pilot of Firefly before, but nothing else. While I was watching Serenity, I was struck by how the first ten minutes seem to critique the war on terror. I mean, this girl is in a classroom and they’re debating the fact that some people ‘don’t want to be free, so we have to free them.’ (Paraphrase.) I read and watch a lot of sci-fi from the cold war era and am behind on current geek culture, which made it a more powerful experience to watch something in such a fantastical TV show that I could connect to life as it is today.

The beauty, though, is that the political commentary is so subtle that you wouldn’t notice it unless you know a lot about the context in which the movie is produced. It’s perfectly possible that children who see Serenity twenty years in the future won’t pick up on the political commentary. And that subtlety is exactly why I love speculative fiction – I think it’s a lot harder for conventional fiction to critique political events in such a subtle manner.

But this works for more abstract concepts, too, not just political commentary.

I just finished Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. LeGuin, which is high fantasy. While reading it, a passage in particular struck me:

But if once the shadow caught up with Ged it could draw the power out of him, and take from him the very weight and warmth and life of his body and the will that moved him.

Now, on the surface, it’s talking about an evil shadow-creature that is chasing the main character. But is it possible that LeGuin is talking about something else? To me, that sounds a fucking lot like the experience of having clinical depression. An evil shadow that you can’t control sucking out all of your willpower? Hell yes, that describes depression to a T. So I read the shadow as an extended metaphor for depression, which made the experience of reading the book a lot more poignant for me. I won’t spoil the ending but it’s pretty great.

Now, imagine reading a book that is more realistic and coming across a passage like that, and imagine that the author explicitly uses “the shadow” as a metaphor for depression instead of disguising it as an evil creature that will overtake the main character. How would you feel? (Please feel free to take this as a non-rhetorical question; I’d be interested in starting a discussion about this.)

Personally, I would feel slightly annoyed with the author. I would feel as if he or she were insulting my intelligence. My reasoning goes like this: “Of course I know how depression feels. I don’t need you to contrive some stupid metaphor for me to understand it. Instead, immerse me in the experience of what it is like to feel this way, like JD Salinger did in Catcher in the Rye or Sylvia Plath did in The Bell Jar.” But that is just me.

In the end, all fiction requires that you suspend disbelief in some way or other. However, I think that the advantage of speculative fiction is that readers are already willing to suspend more of their disbelief than if they were reading conventional literature. After all, if I’m reading a story in which a man can turn into a dragon and fight other dragons,2 I’m perfectly fine with taking the next step and playing along with the author if she decides to use an extended metaphor. I don’t think that realistic fiction has that degree of flexibility.

-~-~-~
  1. This is from the Wikipedia article on speculative fiction. []
  2. Seriously, Earthsea is so fucking badass. Go read it now. []
Share

Music: Still Deaf?

0
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as , ,

Recently, I’ve really gotten into music with an intensity that surprises even me. I mean, just the other week, I found myself listening to music for, like, five hours in a row or so. I used to be unable to distinguish between genres, but now if I hear an unfamiliar song by a familiar artist, I can identify it.

As a result, I sometimes ask myself: Am I still Deaf? Basically, it’s an existential crisis type of thing.

I mean, in a lot of ways, I am hard-pressed to think of an activity that belongs more to the Hearing world than music does. Just think of the definition: You use your hearing to listen to an arrangement of notes. I don’t think it helps that, in general, I feel pretty isolated from the Deaf community.

So, what has been helping me is thinking of times when I have enjoyed music while immersed in a Deaf community.

Vector graphic of silhouetted party-goers against a blue background.

One year, at Deaf camp, we were all hanging out in a yurt in our downtime. Some of us were chatting, some of us were horsing around. Basically, we were being kids.

Then this one girl pulled out her portable music player and strode over to the center of the yurt. The conversations around the room slowed and everyone stared at her. She put on this really loud song that you could feel and began rocking out to it. People goggled, astonished, but nobody said anything.

Then someone else ran to the floor and began dancing too. Then another person. Then another. Pretty soon, it was a party of Deaf people just dancing to music.

I watched the whole thing with a huge smile on my face, then one of the girls dragged me out of my chair and onto the dance floor. Now, I don’t dance, but I did that day. And, you know what? It was a blast.

-~-~-~

In the end, the truth is that music helps me emotionally. And I enjoy it. So what if I don’t fit in someone else’s preconceived notion of “what Deaf people like to do”? That’s OK with me.

Share

Balancing Personal vs Objective Meaning in Art

2
Filed under Uncategorized
Tagged as ,

A while back, I wrote a rant about literary criticism. In a nutshell, my thinking was that we should consider the author’s intent instead of just saying, “I can interpret this however I want to.”

I was thinking about it, and I realized that, in some cases, I don’t care if people have an unorthodox interpretation of a piece of art. Most notably, I think some minorities use unorthodox interpretations to help them through hard times. They have to basically adopt some works of art to speak to them personally even though it wasn’t originally intended to do so. Queen Emily summed it up really well in her discussion of watching Queen Priscialla, Re-watching movies, over at Questioning Transphobia:

I think when you’re young, you get what you need out of movies and discard the rest–a process so selective that looking back you wonder how you pulled anything useful from there at all. Marginalised people can do wonderfully perverse things with texts, but the sad thing is we have to.

Because there’s no real affirming alternative, and turning poison into cure is the only cultural option we have.

Sometimes we minorities have to use unorthodox interpretations to get us through hard times. And that’s fine with me. Use whatever you have to use to cope; this is a healthier coping method than some, all things considered.

But I think that a realistic viewpoint is important as well once we get past the hard times, especially if we come to a position of authority, so that we don’t inadvertently cause pain in others. For example, I almost showed Boys Don’t Cry to the gay-straight alliance in high school because I was all, “HOLY SHIT TRANS MEN EXIST! EVERYONE SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TRANS MEN!” Thankfully, others talked me out of that because showing a bunch of gay (and some trans) teens that movie, which is filled with nasty people, homo/transphobia, and horribly graphic rape & murder scenes, is not a great idea.

In general, I think it’s important to (A) acknowledge that your interpretation is unorthodox (B) phrase your interpretation in “I” terms. That is, instead of saying, “In x, the author wanted to convey…” I think it’s better to say, “The impact that x had on me was…”

I have a philosophy of keeping all things in balance. This is no exception – finding a balance between an objective and personal interpretation of art is the best way to go, in my opinion.

Share